From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from devils.ext.ti.com ([198.47.26.153]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.72 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1OZNEv-0000Ar-CC for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 12:08:34 +0000 From: "Sudhakar Rajashekhara" To: "'Jon Povey'" , References: <1279170641-24494-1-git-send-email-sudhakar.raj@ti.com> <70E876B0EA86DD4BAF101844BC814DFE0903CBD539@Cloud.RL.local> <034101cb2412$ac5bcde0$051369a0$@raj@ti.com> In-Reply-To: <034101cb2412$ac5bcde0$051369a0$@raj@ti.com> Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] mtd-nand: davinci: correct 4-bit error correction Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 17:33:03 +0530 Message-ID: <034501cb2415$ad54cc80$07fe6580$@raj@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-us Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, dwmw2@infradead.org, davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 17:11:32, Sudhakar Rajashekhara wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 16:31:19, Jon Povey wrote: > > Sudhakar Rajashekhara wrote: > > > On TI's DA830/OMAP-L137, DA850/OMAP-L138 and DM365, after setting the > > > 4BITECC_ADD_CALC_START bit in the NAND Flash control register to 1 and > > > before waiting for the NAND Flash status register to be equal to 1, 2 > > > or 3, we have to wait till the ECC HW goes to correction state. > > > Without this wait, ECC correction calculations will not be proper. > > > > > > This has been tested on DA830/OMAP-L137, DA850/OMAP-L138, DM355 and > > > DM365 EVMs. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Sudhakar Rajashekhara > > > Acked-by: Sneha Narnakaje > > > Cc: David Woodhouse > > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton > > > > Have these people acked and signed off this new version of the patch? > > > > No. Andrew Morton has not signed off this version. I'll remove > Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton > Andrew Morton had signed off an earlier version of this patch and it was present in -mm tree for a long time. He has not yet commented on v2 version of this patch. But I thought I can carry forward the Sign-offs from previous version to the next version. What's the common practice? Thanks, Sudhakar