From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pecos2.iphase.com ([157.175.3.201] helo=iphase.com)
	by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hat Linux))
	id 18KF27-000428-00
	for <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>; Fri, 06 Dec 2002 09:44:31 +0000
Received: from france.iphase.com (ariane [157.175.31.1])
	by iphase.com (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.7) with ESMTP id EAA23848
	for <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>; Fri, 6 Dec 2002 04:14:34 -0600 (CST)
Received: from thlang by france.iphase.com
	with SMTP (MDaemon.PRO.v5.0.4.R)
	for <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>; Fri, 06 Dec 2002 11:14:09 +0100
Message-ID: <049e01c29d0f$b3c52ff0$221faf9d@iphase.com>
Reply-To: "Chantara Thlang" <thlang@iphase.com>
From: "Chantara Thlang" <thlang@iphase.com>
To: <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: need arguments to use  JFFS2
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 11:10:28 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org
Errors-To: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org
List-Help: <mailto:linux-mtd-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd>,
	<mailto:linux-mtd-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list <linux-mtd.lists.infradead.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd>,
	<mailto:linux-mtd-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/>

Hi everybody,

In the web, I am not sure to see an article which clearly express the
advantage of JFFS2.
Can we find any comparison document between all existing Flash FS ? Does it
exist ??
Please could someone give me some arguments to use JFFS2 instead of all
others Flash FS such as CRAMFS ?

One of the reason could it be in the Flash management : optimization ?

Thanks in advance,

Chantara