From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from arroyo.ext.ti.com ([192.94.94.40]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.63 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1H79m8-0001dY-Dm for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 07:20:22 -0500 Received: from dbdp30.itg.ti.com ([172.24.170.39]) by arroyo.ext.ti.com (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id l0HCJg98002868 for ; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 06:19:48 -0600 Received: from x0019732 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dbdp30.itg.ti.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with SMTP id l0HCJe7c000809 for ; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 17:49:41 +0530 (IST) Message-ID: <062f01c73a31$c3e2d5e0$5af5180a@ent.ti.com> From: "Anand Patil" To: Subject: No Lock/unlock support for NAND Devices Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 17:49:39 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi, I want to know why there is no support for Lock and Unlock operations of blocks for NAND devices ( nand_base.c)? I have seen several NAND devices ( SAMSUNG ) make supporting the lock and unlock commands. Warm Regards, Anand Patil