From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailout2.samsung.com ([203.254.224.25]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1E78t8-00067K-W6 for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 05:46:49 -0400 Received: from ep_mmp1 (mailout2.samsung.com [203.254.224.25]) by mailout2.samsung.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 Patch 2 (built Jul 14 2004)) with ESMTP id <0ILM00HWAB5PTA@mailout2.samsung.com> for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 18:46:37 +0900 (KST) Received: from july7 ([168.219.213.193]) by mmp1.samsung.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 Patch 2 (built Jul 14 2004)) with ESMTPA id <0ILM002RXB5POR@mmp1.samsung.com> for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 18:46:37 +0900 (KST) Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 18:46:38 +0900 From: Kyungmin Park In-reply-to: <1124613404.3407.31.camel@localhost.localdomain> To: 'David Woodhouse' Message-id: <0ILM002RYB5POR@mmp1.samsung.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: RE: LTP fs test results on OneNAND Reply-To: kyungmin.park@samsung.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , > > On Sat, 2005-08-20 at 09:06 +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote: > > rwtest01 FAIL 2 > > rwtest02 FAIL 2 > > rwtest03 FAIL 2 > > rwtest04 FAIL 2 > > rwtest05 FAIL 2 > > > Total Failures: 5 > > These are solely due to the lack of shared writable mappings, yes? <<>> doio(rwtest01) ( 918) 14:07:18 --------------------- mmap() failed - 0xffffffff 22 doio(rwtest01) ( 918) 14:07:18 --------------------- mmap-write() request failed: No such file or directory (2) Request number 1 fd 4 is file /tmp/ltp-710/rw-sync-905 - open flags are 010002 O_RDWR,, write done at file offset 0 - pattern is I (0111) number of requests is 1, strides per request is 1 i/o byte count = 107087 memory alignment is unaligned syscall: mmap-write(NULL, 779264, PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, 4, 0) file is mmaped to: 0x0 file-mem=0x0, length=107087, buffer=0x3d369 doio(rwtest01) ( 918) 14:07:18 --------------------- doio(): operation 121 returned != 0 rwtest(rwtest01) : iogen reported errors (r=141) rwtest01 1 FAIL : Test failed The remains are almost same. I don't know why this tests are fail? > > LTP tests correctness -- I like to do JFFS2 runs with some stress > testing, like fsx-linux (and another tool called 'holey' > which stresses > the extent mapping stuff -- http://david.woodhou.se/holey.c). The holey is working well.