From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailout1.samsung.com ([203.254.224.24]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1EAbyP-0001Du-QQ for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 19:26:37 -0400 Received: from ep_mmp1 (mailout1.samsung.com [203.254.224.24]) by mailout1.samsung.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 Patch 2 (built Jul 14 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IM40080514072@mailout1.samsung.com> for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2005 08:26:24 +0900 (KST) Received: from july7 ([168.219.213.193]) by mmp1.samsung.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 Patch 2 (built Jul 14 2004)) with ESMTPA id <0IM40087K13ZIL@mmp1.samsung.com> for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2005 08:26:24 +0900 (KST) Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2005 08:26:24 +0900 From: Kyungmin Park In-reply-to: <4315BD10.80209@gmail.com> To: 'Bernhard Priewasser' Message-id: <0IM40087L13ZIL@mmp1.samsung.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: RE: [PATCH] OneNAND: Update OMAP OneNAND mapping using device driver model Reply-To: kyungmin.park@samsung.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi In previous way. we have to modify omap-onenand.c file itself. and it is difficult to adapt another omap platform. But each platform has some different partition configurations and chip-select. e.g., OSK use CS2 as OneNAND, But my custom board use CS3. So I move the partition information to each platform as NOR does e.g., linux/arm/arch/mach-omap1/board-*.c Now we only modify each platform configuation file. Regrads, Kyungmin Park > -----Original Message----- > From: Bernhard Priewasser [mailto:priewasser@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2005 11:22 PM > To: kyungmin.park@samsung.com > Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH] OneNAND: Update OMAP OneNAND mapping > using device driver model > > Hi Kyungmin, > > what are the advantages in opposite to the existing way, e.g. (why) > shall I use it for "porting" the OneNAND stuff to another board? > > Regards, > Bernhard > >