From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6FF1C43458 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2026 07:32:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From :Date:MIME-Version:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=KEgGiXk/IgvuFVUfLhgW52MfSuhkToZmmJkOw1kTGPA=; b=NKkLsuC+ZBa1WBAnZ9dCE+JNAM 18dHWB9XnXfac9MzTgesalQtSRx9z0wLiR4PRSKMygVLMZCmkg6b84seObUfEe70rTKSVyQea+y0L 4jQQSy5yvHeHjBTQ0vS8TkXziuMRru+GSaOZUlWQVrm6qLixU8hRvmAtzgLyhWts1FXQOZjgor44E muvuvQBSynwLVixV9N5mr5jyc0hxnnv63Ai2ksawA1uD49p/D5Y5bH3HUdDXNDFQedNl2UpV5tBgm L6hN9QFBD1rpqoODLUJpesEujLSIGsiqcEexHYZlC5DsLhrEpqICj3o6AjZSyrHeQ+8ER8wVwlc2I AJcBLY3Q==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wepQk-00000000uPB-1VON; Wed, 01 Jul 2026 07:32:22 +0000 Received: from sea.source.kernel.org ([172.234.252.31]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wepQj-00000000uOj-29hh for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 01 Jul 2026 07:32:21 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) by sea.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46EA943892; Wed, 1 Jul 2026 07:32:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D7E961F000E9; Wed, 1 Jul 2026 07:32:19 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1782891141; bh=P5Bfbip9qYctWAn/GXf879mOOovT7syPqx1kyDWbY0o=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=SDF8cHbHUzt/D40qAuHIsDLs1MOF5o4TXzaCJJGiZRS4iDzNfdw4LCfLF7a6I5Wh1 sKFungFZbeYPb+PoJKYPe8b3iFg/+1SCB2/Gfb4H7uZB/09ZMa9djgTown6C08oPZj 1gakyB4yhSHEnRfjRM1OPgaw5V9BPw9ClCGsMIYEbbywheeZYp1ayR6zro3YKUTacE l9Myiz+QY7z3txeF5Yx1ZXJcSm/AngCCK1Q+OVtJ1vne7PsUnzz0wj/XFtvGjgZOYE tQR6elowwpBxrkRyuU/ZRmXIIev3dehoriyheBcFXWTu5eu//DVrCVojQtG3auUwos Vc2l8cT9izXWQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2026 09:32:17 +0200 From: Michael Walle To: Miquel Raynal Cc: Pratyush Yadav , Richard Weinberger , Vignesh Raghavendra , Takahiro Kuwano , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: Sashiko to track linux-mtd In-Reply-To: <87pl19s7ng.fsf@bootlin.com> References: <875x38mlk7.fsf@bootlin.com> <2vxz4iismi2m.fsf@kernel.org> <87pl19s7ng.fsf@bootlin.com> Message-ID: <0fe3140096bc48a8e71838362220d9f8@kernel.org> X-Sender: mwalle@kernel.org X-BeenThere: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "linux-mtd" Errors-To: linux-mtd-bounces+linux-mtd=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi, >>> https://github.com/sashiko-dev/sashiko/blob/main/MAINTAINERS_GUIDE.md > > There are a couple more questions we should answer regarding e-mail > delivery: > > - Shall Sashiko reply to all/just the author/a list of individuals? > > If we go for e-mails, I'd answer to the thread, so "reply_all". But > I'm open. I'd go to let it only reply to us, which will review the comments and forward them (or mention them with a link to the webinterface). But I'm open to just use reply_all, I just fear that a submitter will reply to useless/wrong suggestions. > - Shall we set an embargo? > > I'd be tempted to say "no"). Whatever that is and how it will work with the reply_all option? > - Shall Sashiko send a positive review in case nothing was spot? > > If we enable e-mails, I'd be tempted to say "yes". yeah probably. -michael ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/