[Fwd: Re: 2.4.16-rmk1 patch file]

[Fwd: Re: 2.4.16-rmk1 patch file]

[Georg Nikodym]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 205 bytes --]

I sent the attached to the ARM kernel list because of a ^M the official
ARM architecture and Russell says that it's actually in the MTD CVS...

(I'm not on this list, so you'll need to Cc me on replies)



[-- Attachment #2: Forwarded message - Re: 2.4.16-rmk1 patch file --]
[-- Type: message/rfc822, Size: 1884 bytes --]

From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Georg Nikodym <georgn@somanetworks.com>
Cc: linux-arm@lists.arm.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: 2.4.16-rmk1 patch file
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 16:17:55 +0000
Message-ID: <20011206161755.C11287@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>

On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 10:56:21AM -0500, Georg Nikodym wrote:
> In the "One of lifes minor irritations" department, patch-2.4.16-rmk1
> contains the following useless change:
> 
> diff -urN orig/fs/jffs2/erase.c linux/fs/jffs2/erase.c
> --- orig/fs/jffs2/erase.c       Sun Oct 14 20:53:27 2001
> +++ linux/fs/jffs2/erase.c      Thu Nov  1 20:36:07 2001
> @@ -215,7 +215,7 @@
> 
>         D2({
>                 int i=0;
> -        struct jffs2_raw_node_ref *this;
> +        struct jffs2_raw_node_ref *this;               ^M
>          printk(KERN_DEBUG "After remove_node_refs_from_ino_list: \n"
> KERN_DEBUG
> );
> 
> (The control-m is real in the actual patch).
> 
> Can this diff be removed, please?

Please ask on the MTD list - the ^M appears to be in the MTD CVS.

Re: [Fwd: Re: 2.4.16-rmk1 patch file]

[David Woodhouse]

georgn@somanetworks.com said:
> I sent the attached to the ARM kernel list because of a ^M the
> official ARM architecture and Russell says that it's actually in the
> MTD CVS...

> -        struct jffs2_raw_node_ref *this;
> +        struct jffs2_raw_node_ref *this;               ^M


Fixed. Thanks. 

/me stares hard at fgiasson. :)

--
dwmw2