From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from post2.inre.asu.edu ([129.219.110.73]) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 16ULXv-00040I-00 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2002 05:38:36 +0000 Received: from conversion.post2.inre.asu.edu by asu.edu (PMDF V6.1 #40111) id <0GQJ00L016UQ7R@asu.edu> for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 25 Jan 2002 22:49:38 -0700 (MST) Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 22:49:54 -0700 From: Russ Dill Subject: Re: Cf Card vs DiskOnChip In-reply-to: <20020126041928.83711.qmail@web8103.in.yahoo.com> To: Ramya Ravichandran Cc: David Woodhouse , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Message-id: <1012024195.2411.22.camel@russ> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit References: <20020126041928.83711.qmail@web8103.in.yahoo.com> Sender: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On Fri, 2002-01-25 at 21:19, Ramya Ravichandran wrote: > > > What kind of reliability problems? Cards that are > > DOA? Or random bit > > > errors during usage? > > > > Death on power failure. > > > > Vipin's report at > > > http://www.embeddedlinuxworks.com/articles/jffs_guide.html > > seems fairly typical. > > Thanks but price is a major concern for us and CF > cards are 1/3 rd the price of DOC.So I guess my PM > might settle for CF cards. did you miss the discussion on not needing 128M?