From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from cpe-144-132-147-2.nsw.bigpond.net.au ([144.132.147.2] helo=fuego.linuxaus.com) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 17Mr1B-0000QR-00 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2002 15:10:05 +0100 Received: from beamer.servat.com (beamer.servat.com [192.168.1.6]) by fuego.linuxaus.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9028F8325 for ; Wed, 26 Jun 2002 00:09:58 +1000 (EST) Subject: OpenSSH/OpenSSL is too big... any alternatives? From: Gonzalo Servat To: Linux MTD mailing list Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-xnaIps8yIY0J2szTmWOh" Date: 26 Jun 2002 00:09:58 +1000 Message-Id: <1025014199.2220.3.camel@beamer.servat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: --=-xnaIps8yIY0J2szTmWOh Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi All I have a 2MiB DiskOnChip. After installing the kernel, BusyBox, iptables and a couple of libs from uClibc I only have 400k left of space. OpenSSH needs to link to OpenSSL and OpenSSL is well over 1MB on it's own. Is there any alternatives to OpenSSL/OpenSSH that will fit on 400k? Thanks in advance! Regards, Gonzalo. --=-xnaIps8yIY0J2szTmWOh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQA9GHm2vTbSWKMx8O4RAkOZAJ4tn0esLxEx1Bp7IOGyhrm1OyXW3ACfRNJi STAuqC3VdYdxIDNVWczs0Fs= =oyzy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-xnaIps8yIY0J2szTmWOh--