Re: OpenSSH/OpenSSL is too big... any alternatives?

[Gonzalo Servat <gonzalo@linuxaus.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1737 bytes --]

I did have a look at LSH but I had other problems getting it to work so
I gave up on that one too :)

Now I'm down to using netkit
(ftp.uk.linux.org/pub/linux/Networking/netkit) but getting it to compile
vs uClibc is tricky. I still get errors to do with 'rpc'. I've decided
to just use telnet for the time being (until I can get a bigger DOC) but
even this task is looking doubtful :(

Has anyone had any success compiling netkit (inetd & telnet server)
against uClibc?

Thanks in advance!

Regards,
Gonzalo

On Wed, 2002-06-26 at 00:50, Paul Jimenez wrote:
> 
> You might look at LSH, a smaller implementation, linked to off
> of the uclibc page ( http://www.uclibc.org/uClibc-apps.html )
> as being http://www.net.lut.ac.uk/psst/ .  No guarantees that it works..
> it looks to be SSH v2 protocol, but not updated very recently.
> My only connection with it is remembering that it existed on the above
> uclibc page :)  Have fun,
> 
>   --pj
> 
> On Tuesday, Jun 25, 2002, cfowler writes:
> >I got the same problem but I'm running off floppy.
> >
> >
> >On Tue, 2002-06-25 at 10:09, Gonzalo Servat wrote:
> >> Hi All
> >> 
> >> I have a 2MiB DiskOnChip. After installing the kernel, BusyBox, iptables
> >> and a couple of libs from uClibc I only have 400k left of space.
> >> OpenSSH needs to link to OpenSSL and OpenSSL is well over 1MB on it's
> >> own. Is there any alternatives to OpenSSL/OpenSSH that will fit on 400k?
> >> 
> >> Thanks in advance!
> >> 
> >> Regards,
> >> 
> >> Gonzalo.
> >> 
> >> 
> >
> >
> >
> >______________________________________________________
> >Linux MTD discussion mailing list
> >http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
> >
> 


[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 232 bytes --]