From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from gateway-1237.mvista.com ([12.44.186.158] helo=av.mvista.com) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 17PAon-00036K-00 for ; Tue, 02 Jul 2002 00:42:53 +0100 Received: from zeus.mvista.com (av [127.0.0.1]) by av.mvista.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA17598 for ; Mon, 1 Jul 2002 16:42:52 -0700 Subject: Atmel 49BV1614A parts From: Pete Popov To: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: 01 Jul 2002 16:46:32 -0700 Message-Id: <1025567192.16123.78.camel@zeus.mvista.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: I'm having a problem with the above parts which I finally debugged to a different sector scheme from the older 49BV1614 parts. The 1614 has 8 8KB sectors, 2 32KB sectors, and 30 64B sectors. The newer 1614A has 8 8KB sectors, and 31 64KB sectors. But both parts have the same manufacturer and device IDs so I don't see any way of differentiating the two. Any ideas on how to best handle this? There is some sort of "additional" id in the newer part, but the current mtd layer has no support for this. I'm not on the list so a direct reply would be appreciated. Thanks a lot. Pete