From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp-out.bhp.t-online.de ([195.145.119.39] helo=orvill.bhp.t-online.de) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 17lnWp-0005Mg-00 for ; Mon, 02 Sep 2002 10:29:51 +0100 Received: from ylva.bhp.t-online.de (ylva.ada.t-online.de [172.30.8.40]) by smtp-out.bhp.t-online.de (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 (built Feb 21 2002)) with SMTP id <0H1T00J4A10WEK@smtp-out.bhp.t-online.de> for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 02 Sep 2002 11:29:21 +0200 (MEST) Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2002 11:28:56 +0200 From: Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: Smart card 64 MB v. 128 MB In-reply-to: <3850FE6A-BC64-11D6-9352-000393467F1A@arlut.utexas.edu> To: Ken Offer Cc: LinuxMTD Message-id: <1030958937.1704.3.camel@thomas.tec.linutronix.de> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT References: <3850FE6A-BC64-11D6-9352-000393467F1A@arlut.utexas.edu> Sender: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On Sat, 2002-08-31 at 00:02, Ken Offer wrote: > Hello all, > > Does anyone know why a nand-driver which works for a 64 MB smart card > would NOT work for a 128 MB smart card? I've checked the data sheets > and the two devices look very similar (same block size, same ecc size, > same 22-pads, etc.) My driver mounts the device just fine but when I > try to erase I get I/O errors. I'm going to look into the software > side of this but I thought I'd consult the group to find if there are > any hardware issues. > Should work with 128MB. Which device & manufacturer ID is displayed, when you mount your device ? There should be a output: NAND device: Manufacturer ID ............. -- Thomas ____________________________________________________ linutronix - competence in embedded & realtime linux http://www.linutronix.de mail: tglx@linutronix.de