From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [209.92.187.33] (helo=core.arrancar.com) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 18XoCk-0005Ow-00 for ; Sun, 12 Jan 2003 19:55:34 +0000 Received: from core.arrancar.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core.arrancar.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id h0CJhiNN026829 for ; Sun, 12 Jan 2003 16:43:45 -0300 Subject: Re: JFFS2 on block devices From: Federico Ferreres To: David Woodhouse Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org In-Reply-To: <13805.1042363286@passion.cambridge.redhat.com> References: <1042352498.1998.19.camel@tp> <13805.1042363286@passion.cambridge.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: 12 Jan 2003 17:22:05 -0300 Message-Id: <1042402929.12878.10.camel@tp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On Sun, 2003-01-12 at 06:21, David Woodhouse wrote: > Out of interest, are you using the current code from CVS or the stable > branch from the 2.4 kernel? The current code should mount a _lot_ faster. > How long does it take to mount? I am using the kernel version and mount time is about 15 minutes on this celeron 433. After mounting, speed and reliability are great. I'll test the CVS version today and report back! Regards, Federico > -- > dwmw2 > >