From: roger <rogerxxmaillist@san.rr.com>
To: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: Problems with using doc2001 module
Date: 11 Jun 2003 02:01:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1055322085.31819.31.camel@localhost3.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1055118239.10424.49.camel@localhost3.localdomain>
ok. just for kicks. i booted into DOS using M-SYS's tffs_5.1.4_DOS_TOOLS
and dinfo and dformat refused to find the DiskonChip even after
specifing it's address of 0xfff00000.
something isn't right here. it's obviously something with the code. I
also get the same results on a duplicate 440BX motherboard.
arrrghh.
On Sun, 2003-06-08 at 17:23, roger wrote:
> For the past couple of days and using every available option with
> docprobe (kernel compile time options), I have not been able to get the
> several DiskOnChips-2001 recognized by kernel 2.4.20.
>
> by a fluke accident, i've gotten the DOC recognized.
>
> I'm on a 2x750P3 SMP Tyan Tiger 1832dl and induced a "kernel oops" on
> cpu1 by trying to insmod ./bios.o
> (http://www.openbios.info/download/index.html
> devbios-0.3.2.tar.gz).
>
> the docprobe.o is compiled with "Physical Address = 0" and no other
> options for docprobe.o. ... using doc2001.o
>
> i've attached dmesg output below of the oops condition when trying to
> insmod bios.o and then after the kernel-oops occurred, modprobed
> mtdcore, mtdchar,dos2001,dosprobe doc_config_location=0xfff00000.
> (unknown if the doc_config_location is needed...have yet to try without
> as i've only duplicated 3 times.)
>
> (i've been advised that there might be a "hidden write enable" problem -
> i.e. there is a special GPIO line used to control write enable in
> addition to the normal mechanism.)
--
Roger
http://www.eskimo.com/~roger/index.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-11 9:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-09 0:23 Problems with using doc2001 module roger
2003-06-09 9:02 ` David Woodhouse
2003-06-11 9:01 ` roger [this message]
2003-06-11 9:14 ` David Woodhouse
2003-06-11 23:53 ` Problems with using doc2001 module - 000F0000 roger
2003-06-12 5:56 ` David Woodhouse
2003-06-12 19:50 ` roger
2003-06-11 10:01 ` Problems with using doc2001 module roger
2003-06-11 10:09 ` David Woodhouse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1055322085.31819.31.camel@localhost3.localdomain \
--to=rogerxxmaillist@san.rr.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox