From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
To: roger <rogerxxmaillist@san.rr.com>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: Problems with using doc2001 module - 000F0000
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 06:56:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1055397377.16455.129.camel@imladris.demon.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1055375590.31819.567.camel@localhost3.localdomain>
On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 00:53, roger wrote:
> The DiskOnChip (DoC) Shows the following (data doesn't start again until
> approximately 000F57F0)
> 000F57F0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 55 AA 10
> EB 3C 00 00 28 ................U...<..(
> 000F5808 43 29 4D 2D 53 79 73 74 65 6D 73 31 39 39 38 00 00 00 21
> 00 00 04 00 1C C)M-Systems1998...!.....
This is a hexdump from physical memory?
Odd. That 0x55 0xAA ought to be at 0xF0000. Is it possible that your
address lines to the chip are in the wrong order?
What happens if you now unload the l440gx module and load the DiskOnChip
driver, with the probe address 0xf5800?
> It certainly looks like i'm looking at the actual chips through the
> L440GX memory map and the modules load fine without having to induce the
> kernel panic. However, the offset of the start & ending of the hardware
> chip appears incorrect. I'm guessing I only have to modify the l440gx.c
> code to reflect the proper parameters? On the cosemetic side of things,
> the module labels the DoC as a "L440GX BIOS" instead of a "DOC
> MIL"....another small oddity.
It thinks it's ROM, and that's why it's labelled as BIOS. You're only
loading the l440gx module to make it do the PCI config magic to enable
writes to that physical address range.
Unless you load the DiskOnChip driver, you won't drive a DiskOnChip
properly ;)
--
dwmw2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-12 5:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-09 0:23 Problems with using doc2001 module roger
2003-06-09 9:02 ` David Woodhouse
2003-06-11 9:01 ` roger
2003-06-11 9:14 ` David Woodhouse
2003-06-11 23:53 ` Problems with using doc2001 module - 000F0000 roger
2003-06-12 5:56 ` David Woodhouse [this message]
2003-06-12 19:50 ` roger
2003-06-11 10:01 ` Problems with using doc2001 module roger
2003-06-11 10:09 ` David Woodhouse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1055397377.16455.129.camel@imladris.demon.co.uk \
--to=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=rogerxxmaillist@san.rr.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox