public inbox for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
To: "J.D. Bakker" <bakker@thorgal.et.tudelft.nl>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: Handling multiple NAND chips
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 11:56:09 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1059148567.28255.47.camel@lapdancer.baythorne.internal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a05200f01bb4700e6ff94@[130.161.115.44]>

On Fri, 2003-07-25 at 11:51, J.D. Bakker wrote:
> I have a two-hour old CVS; where should I look ?

The fact that select_chip() now takes a 'chip_number' argument, that
nand_scan() now takes a 'max_chips' argument and probes for up to that
many... next is to fix the read/write/erase functions to select the
_correct_ chip according to the address, etc. 

> Does it *help* to have separate data/CLE/ALE ?

Probably not. What may help, and to be honest I won't be 100% sure till
we actually come to implement it, is having separate FR/B# so you can
happily poll for completion and leave multiple chips _busy_
independently.

-- 
dwmw2

  reply	other threads:[~2003-07-25 15:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-07-25 15:12 Handling multiple NAND chips J.D. Bakker
2003-07-25 15:36 ` David Woodhouse
2003-07-25 15:51   ` J.D. Bakker
2003-07-25 15:56     ` David Woodhouse [this message]
2003-07-26 10:22       ` J.D. Bakker
2003-07-26 11:39         ` Thomas Gleixner
2003-07-26 15:08           ` David Woodhouse
2003-07-26 17:20             ` Thomas Gleixner
2003-07-26 15:06         ` David Woodhouse
2003-07-26 18:20           ` J.D. Bakker
2003-07-26 19:05             ` David Woodhouse
2003-07-27 12:54       ` J.D. Bakker
2003-07-27 13:42         ` David Woodhouse
2003-07-27 13:58           ` J.D. Bakker
2003-07-27 16:28             ` David Woodhouse
2003-07-25 15:51 ` David Woodhouse
2003-07-26  0:27 ` Charles Manning
2003-07-26 10:32   ` J.D. Bakker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1059148567.28255.47.camel@lapdancer.baythorne.internal \
    --to=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=bakker@thorgal.et.tudelft.nl \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox