From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from dhcp893.linuxsymposium.org ([209.151.11.135] helo=lapdancer.baythorne.internal) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.14 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 19gUNX-00072m-DV for ; Sat, 26 Jul 2003 20:06:52 +0100 From: David Woodhouse To: "J.D. Bakker" In-Reply-To: References: <1059147413.28255.40.camel@lapdancer.baythorne.internal> <1059148567.28255.47.camel@lapdancer.baythorne.internal> <1059231977.539.2.camel@lapdancer.baythorne.internal> Message-Id: <1059246321.1471.3.camel@lapdancer.baythorne.internal> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2003 15:05:23 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: Handling multiple NAND chips List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sat, 2003-07-26 at 14:20, J.D. Bakker wrote: > Not really, if you exclude braindead setups like multiple > hot-swappable SmartMedia cards. The only sane setup I could imagine > is having one partition per NAND device, but it's not one I would be > using myself. True, but in that case you can still do it as separate devices. > Would you expect all devices to have the same size ? Yes. I made that optimisation for NOR chips and nobody's bitched about it yet, IIRC. -- dwmw2