From: Roger <rogerxxmaillist@speakeasy.net>
To: Selwyn Tang <selwyn@hectrix.com>, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: Problems with DOC 2000 on 2.4.21
Date: 05 Aug 2003 07:32:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1060093933.3861.6.camel@localhost3.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3F2E38FE.8030800@hectrix.com>
On both of my 440BX boards, Intel incorporated a shadow feature which
shadows the mtd devices (bios chip/DIP socket) from the normal mtd
drivers/modules.
I have to utilize the openbios/devbios module/code to unshadow the 440BX
DIP socket.
There are many other chipsets supported for unshadowing in that code. I
believe the code only needs to be implemented into mtd somehow.
But basically, I get nothing found in dmesg when loading the DOC modules
and nothing showing in /proc/mtd* -- but mtdchar does show some info in
the /proc/mtd* files.
After unshadowing the 440BX DIP socket (using openbios/devbios -- i
hacked module to leave the DIP socket unshadowed after unloading;-), and
then loading the mtd/doc modules, I get 'found DOC ...' in dmesg and I
get good info in the /proc/mtd* files.
On Mon, 2003-08-04 at 03:44, Selwyn Tang wrote:
> Dear Roger,
>
> Roger wrote:
> > I usually find after loading the mtd doc200x modules, doing:
> > # modprobe mtdchar
> > will usually produce the /dev/mtd* devices.
>
> When I compiled those MTD stuffs as modules, and after modprobe, I still
> didn't get any /dev/mtd* devices. But when I compiled those as builtin,
> I can cat /proc/mtd and get "mtd0:..." but still no /dev/mtd*
>
> Do you know why?
>
> Selwyn
--
Roger
http://www.eskimo.com/~roger/index.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-08-05 14:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-04 10:08 Problems with DOC 2000 on 2.4.21 Selwyn Tang
2003-08-04 10:23 ` Roger
[not found] ` <3F2E38FE.8030800@hectrix.com>
2003-08-05 14:32 ` Roger [this message]
2003-08-06 1:24 ` Selwyn Tang
2003-08-06 7:55 ` Roger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1060093933.3861.6.camel@localhost3.localdomain \
--to=rogerxxmaillist@speakeasy.net \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=selwyn@hectrix.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox