From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from majordomo by infradead.org with local (Exim 3.20 #2) id 14YlNP-000445-00 for mtd-list@infradead.org; Fri, 02 Mar 2001 08:57:27 +0000 Received: from dell-paw-3.cambridge.redhat.com ([195.224.55.237] helo=passion.cambridge.redhat.com) by infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #2) id 14YlNO-00043z-00 for mtd@infradead.org; Fri, 02 Mar 2001 08:57:26 +0000 From: David Woodhouse In-Reply-To: <15E6537E180CC545848148F30F6688D81945BF@navajo.astanetworks.com> References: <15E6537E180CC545848148F30F6688D81945BF@navajo.astanetworks.com> To: Pete Skelly Cc: "'mtd@infradead.org'" Subject: Re: DOC2000 - 96MB on a 650Mhz PIII - cannot doc_read_ecc Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2001 08:57:23 +0000 Message-ID: <10752.983523443@redhat.com> Sender: owner-mtd@infradead.org List-ID: pete.skelly@astanetworks.com said: > Also, could this be related to some of the problems people are seeing > with larger modules? Do the larger modules have greater delays for > sending commands to the chip, or are they simply found in faster > systems? Or the newer DiskOnChip devices are less tolerant w.r.t timing than the older ones? I think this is probably the cause of most of the problems that people have been seeing. -- dwmw2 To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe mtd" to majordomo@infradead.org