From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Woodhouse To: Roy Lauer In-Reply-To: <20040204101218.92472.qmail@web20416.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20040204101218.92472.qmail@web20416.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1075890631.5699.3.camel@lapdancer.baythorne.internal> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 10:30:32 +0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: gerg@snapgear.com cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: Problems with DOC Millennium Plus List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , If your mailer is broken and loses References: headers, get a real one. Don't just remove 'Re:' from your subject line to get around the filters. On Wed, 2004-02-04 at 02:12 -0800, Roy Lauer wrote: > > The DiskOnChip Millennium Plus uses INFTL not NFTL. > You should be very > > careful using the current INFTL code -- it does not > observe the Bad Block Table. > > What does it mean? > Does it mean that practically the current INFTL code > is unusable with the DiskOnChip Millennium Plus? > > The DOC is recognized correctly but I keep getting > "corrupt block" errors (please see the log below). It does indeed look like it's trying to erase blocks which are actually bad -- which it should have _known_ are bad if it had been able to read the BBT. We really do need to implement support for reading the BBT. -- dwmw2