From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [2002:d592:9a28::1] (helo=pentafluge.infradead.org) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1BvdRo-0007w1-QC for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 13 Aug 2004 10:54:25 -0400 From: David Woodhouse To: Stefan =?ISO-8859-1?Q?St=FCrke?= In-Reply-To: References: <1092400305.10618.145.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Message-Id: <1092408859.14552.3.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 15:54:19 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: mkfs.jffs2 List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, 2004-08-13 at 14:45 +0000, Stefan Stürke wrote: > jffs2_scan_empty(): Empty block at 0x0000fffc ends at 0x00010000 (with > 0x1985e002)! Marking dirty > > Is it save to ignore these errors? Yes. It's observing that there's padding between 0xfffc and 0x10000. This is done because nodes aren't allowed to cross and eraseblock boundary, and the image was created for 64KiB eraseblocks. It's harmless though. -- dwmw2