From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [2002:c1ed:8229::1] (helo=baythorne.infradead.org) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1BzuEt-0001rC-Lp for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 05:38:44 -0400 From: David Woodhouse To: Linh Dang In-Reply-To: References: <20040824120929.1377.qmail@web52204.mail.yahoo.com> <1093350246.14552.12435.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1093426720.3777.1480.camel@imladris.demon.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 10:38:40 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: Bottom halves being disabled List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2004-08-24 at 22:36 -0400, Linh Dang wrote: > Is it safe to convert those spin_locks to mutexes? A spinlock is a mutex. Do you mean convert to semaphores? Why? -- dwmw2