From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 213-239-205-147.clients.your-server.de ([213.239.205.147] helo=debian.tglx.de) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.42 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1CKDHV-0002ZG-3A for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 06:01:22 -0400 From: Thomas Gleixner To: simon@baydel.com In-Reply-To: References: <20041019214518.26339.qmail@web52703.mail.yahoo.com> <1098222917.12223.1020.camel@thomas> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1098266000.12223.1504.camel@thomas> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 11:53:20 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: Bad Blocks On JFFS2/NAND Reply-To: tglx@linutronix.de List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, 2004-10-20 at 11:40, Simon Haynes wrote: > This 5 error business is only if you have relatively new code. Old code > generates an incorrect and permanent bad block after 1 failure. I am testing > the suggestion by Thomas that this is a page cache problem by always marking > an erase page as invalid. No errors as yet but I will keep you posted. A cvs history search should reveal the changes to the nr errors thing and to the page cache fixes. So you can verify against your particular version. tglx