From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CE11C61DB4 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2026 09:59:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References: In-Reply-To:Subject:CC:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=639WmbL52g5cGj8dT+P/e0oMV9H/DSrq3OieK7+96sA=; b=CN3KRZS+D+knTi x/GIVXALNzPcNzoSUGGW3H6qNnq8j6O70ShZZQy4wp+jYxI7/zec6bA/f7Ayek/nTMtM/mXgT38EP 0NpCiWDxAMdYy0TdVVWBDYamoCQJXqKSFtGsWoz+PGoF/WAKdGYt8J6rdM0NRUyZaRUIevHlZuCqx EWxsfg1FuxFL+RY8OYQAEE3m6wPrRXJwGRT2u42ALS1Gb9IbpFx3BrXwE8lPn9bKCvxbfdTb39P7k tXqaiiGapPW8LTGdR0ctN0zSduLIdPj6ocizCnyZXsF81Pk8gm6cCSIyaBwf1HQZKTjryrer5hlP7 sRNSY5sTGxCrCgsq33Pg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wynvy-00000000Xig-0IxA; Tue, 25 Aug 2026 09:59:10 +0000 Received: from 0001.3ffe.de ([159.69.201.130]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wynvv-00000000Xg4-283g for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 25 Aug 2026 09:59:08 +0000 Received: from ehlo.thunderbird.net (unknown [IPv6:2a00:20:d234:bae8:a238:320e:c3e3:77c7]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.3ffe.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3D738103; Tue, 25 Aug 2026 11:58:54 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=walle.cc; s=mail2022082101; t=1787651934; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=1VPB86GX6OCqmQcqxCJL58XknddeyBndznxbchDbXtk=; b=aND/1m1fkGnQlGEq2eSJz8Xdlw+pv8qcOa2xuwXgUy8MGEWzW3b0FOIAtbNLTHKoVW0Jb/ t1JuxpNIYoELb77wivFhNVFNVdsRv0P9+PxXgOsC4rsITMVp5KADG+GS4cyb+FX3xZgIzf mH8l9BLwQCHfZ6u5rJmZ+OEyhOMgzFXN/lFPAACo2hxNcyB7GCeGTFBLURrE/Tbd690VvA GJnsX9WI0XclOgoVxjb1l/hLHM7QtO5k1tyY4dR5wdMdpW+gEAqnXdgpoN+FdoqJRfKblN FUkbLxTLM/A+TZOEuM9ArmROn1C553YlEDjgmtm6bLdqtEr0ozCwayauYMQPeg== Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2026 11:58:53 +0200 From: Michael Walle To: Miquel Raynal , Takahiro.Kuwano@infineon.com CC: mwalle@kernel.org, pratyush@kernel.org, richard@nod.at, vigneshr@ti.com, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: Sashiko to track linux-mtd User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: <87v78yimb1.fsf@bootlin.com> References: <875x38mlk7.fsf@bootlin.com> <2vxz4iismi2m.fsf@kernel.org> <87pl19s7ng.fsf@bootlin.com> <0fe3140096bc48a8e71838362220d9f8@kernel.org> <8733xikmb9.fsf@bootlin.com> <8733xhiqyn.fsf@bootlin.com> <87v78yimb1.fsf@bootlin.com> Message-ID: <10CE8F35-D4FC-4CE8-B687-1154DF9915CF@walle.cc> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.9.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20260825_025907_714982_DF9C585D X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 11.59 ) X-BeenThere: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-mtd" Errors-To: linux-mtd-bounces+linux-mtd=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi, Am 25. August 2026 11:25:38 MESZ schrieb Miquel Raynal : >Hello, > >On 17/07/2026 at 17:19:28 +02, Miquel Raynal wrote: > >> Hello folks, >> >>> So I will make a PR for enabling it, but let's keep in mind that this is >>> experimental and can be re-discussed at any time. >> >> FYI: https://github.com/sashiko-dev/sashiko/pull/336 > >I am partially satisfied about how Sashiko intervenes in my review >flow, here is my current feeling. > >About Sashiko itself: >+ many interesting findings, worth enabling for sure >+ most of the findings are correct, but not always worth another version >- no possible feedback loop (eg. "this is an hallucination, stop > bothering us with this") >- pre-existing issues are flagged at the same "level" as new issues > >About our configuration of Sashiko: >- it takes more time to me to do the check, copy & paste dance every > time there is something I find really needed >- I get Cc'ed on reviews of patches I did not receive (eg. jffs2 things) Yeah I noticed that, too. >In the end I would like to modify the current configuration in order for >Sashiko to act as a regular reviewer, ie. just answer to all recipients, >including the author: > >- cc = ... >+ reply_all = true >+ reply_to_author = true I'm fine with the change. Let's see how patch submitters will react. -michael ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/