From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Woodhouse To: Jonas Holmberg In-Reply-To: <20050203095842.GA20345@axis.com> References: <20050202110715.GH27015@axis.com> <20050203095842.GA20345@axis.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 10:23:52 +0000 Message-Id: <1107426233.12383.46.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: Device ID collision in amd_flash.c List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 2005-02-03 at 10:58 +0100, Jonas Holmberg wrote: > Silly me, who cares about obsolete drivers... > Let me rephrase that question: Any objections before I commit on > friday (tomorrow)? Sorry, go ahead. > I still would like to know how bugfixes finds their way into Linux > 2.4. As I understand, the main trunk in CVS is for 2.6 and I can't > find any 2.4-branch... In general, they don't get in to 2.4. Nobody cares about 2.4 any more. If it _works_ for you, all well and good. But if it hasn't already been working for you for a year, then why are you trying to make it work now? Use 2.6. Feel free to send this change to Marcelo if you really care. -- dwmw2