From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Woodhouse To: Gareth Bult In-Reply-To: <1110234361.11310.63.camel@squizzey.bult.co.uk> References: <1110043569.11425.63.camel@squizzey.bult.co.uk> <20050307110413.GD2198@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> <1110200816.11535.15.camel@squizzey.bult.co.uk> <20050307142402.GC9597@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> <1110220494.11445.44.camel@squizzey.bult.co.uk> <20050307190012.GA24412@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> <1110226862.29792.149.camel@baythorne.infradead.org> <1110229064.11284.18.camel@squizzey.bult.co.uk> <1110230771.4591.12.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1110233417.11311.58.camel@squizzey.bult.co.uk> <1110234015.4591.16.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1110234361.11310.63.camel@squizzey.bult.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2005 22:30:14 +0000 Message-Id: <1110234614.4591.21.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Linux MTD Subject: Re: Re; MTD (2) Block Driver broken List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 22:26 +0000, Gareth Bult wrote: > I don't recall the specifics .. it was part of a conversation .. > nothing startling different from the emails I've been posting here > today Which were all accepted on the list apart from the one which was HTML. Of the HTML mail we reject, most of it is spam -- I'm perfectly content with rejecting HTML mail to the list, and it's not a particularly uncommon occurrence. If you have content which can only sanely be represented in HTML form, then you can always send it as an attachment. -- dwmw2