From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Woodhouse To: "Artem B. Bityuckiy" In-Reply-To: <42429C1C.8050600@yandex.ru> References: <4241396B.D689EB32@st.com> <4242925F.D29BC7CE@st.com> <42429C1C.8050600@yandex.ru> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 22:00:59 +0000 Message-Id: <1111701659.6588.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: atomic file operations List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 13:53 +0300, Artem B. Bityuckiy wrote: > then you have the guarantee that you either have written all or > nowthing. JFFS2 does guarantee that due to its implementation. JFFS2 might happen to _do_ that due to its implementation, but it's not a guarantee. POSIX doesn't require that writes are atomic w.r.t power failure. -- dwmw2