From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
To: "Zhao, Forrest" <forrest.zhao@intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <8126E4F969BA254AB43EA03C59F44E840263CED0@pdsmsx404>
References: <8126E4F969BA254AB43EA03C59F44E840263CED0@pdsmsx404>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 11:18:20 +0100
Message-Id: <1118830701.22181.54.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: RE: jffs2 corrupt rarely, how to fix it?
List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list <linux-mtd.lists.infradead.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd>,
	<mailto:linux-mtd-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-mtd-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd>,
	<mailto:linux-mtd-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=subscribe>

On Wed, 2005-06-15 at 17:40 +0800, Zhao, Forrest wrote:
> Hi, David
> 
> Would you please give me some information about the difference
> between the JFFS2 in 2.4 kernel and the one in 2.6 kernel?
> 
> Will the enhancement and new features of JFFS2 in 2.6 kernel be
> back-ported to 2.4 kernel?
> 
> Hope I comply with the netiquette this time :)

No, your mail still landed in my spam folder because it lacks a
References: header. Please use a non-broken mail program.

-- 
dwmw2