* Re[2]: BLKRRPART bug in NFTL?
[not found] <E15aB7O-0002fC-00@pentafluge.infradead.org>
@ 2001-08-24 9:27 ` ASA
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: ASA @ 2001-08-24 9:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-mtd
Hello Alexandru,
> Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 10:15:29 +0800
> From: Alexandru Harsanyi <a.harsanyi@willhart-tech.com>
> Subject: Re: BLKRRPART bug in NFTL?
>
> I'm not sure about that, but I think DOC should be formated/partitioned
> with nftl_format, not *fdisk.
What? I mean logical partitions, or any kind of logical layer. In
other words, I want to have /dev/nftla1 and /dev/nftla2, not
/dev/nftla and /dev/nftlb
According documentation, nftl_format is designed to "unhose" virgin
chip and destroys firmware BIOS as said recently (in this list).
Isn't it?
In other words, I think that nftl_format can be compared with
fdformat, not mformat - they operates on different layers.
--
Best regards,
ASA mailto:atris@mail.ru
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2001-08-24 9:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <E15aB7O-0002fC-00@pentafluge.infradead.org>
2001-08-24 9:27 ` Re[2]: BLKRRPART bug in NFTL? ASA
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox