From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Woodhouse To: kyungmin.park@samsung.com In-Reply-To: <0ILH00A5RUY3DW@mmp1.samsung.com> References: <0ILH00A5RUY3DW@mmp1.samsung.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 09:36:43 +0100 Message-Id: <1124613404.3407.31.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: LTP fs test results on OneNAND List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sat, 2005-08-20 at 09:06 +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote: > rwtest01 FAIL 2 > rwtest02 FAIL 2 > rwtest03 FAIL 2 > rwtest04 FAIL 2 > rwtest05 FAIL 2 > Total Failures: 5 These are solely due to the lack of shared writable mappings, yes? LTP tests correctness -- I like to do JFFS2 runs with some stress testing, like fsx-linux (and another tool called 'holey' which stresses the extent mapping stuff -- http://david.woodhou.se/holey.c). -- dwmw2