From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 207.88.121.43.ptr.us.xo.net ([207.88.121.43] helo=mail.realmsys.com) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ECa8t-00033S-FO for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 06 Sep 2005 05:53:29 -0400 From: Peter Grayson To: dedekind@infradead.org In-Reply-To: <1125997245.8135.16.camel@sauron.oktetlabs.ru> References: <1124840186.7086.19.camel@localhost.localdomain> <430F09E5.10607@inf.u-szeged.hu> <1125550939.7076.14.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1125997245.8135.16.camel@sauron.oktetlabs.ru> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2005 03:52:56 -0600 Message-Id: <1126000376.7119.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: Latest jffs2 broken? List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 13:00 +0400, Artem B. Bityuckiy wrote: > I have had my vacation, I will glance what is going on. Actually, I have just found that an error in the nand driver I am using is the cause of this problem. The problem only happens with the latest jffs2 code, but I now know it is not the jffs2 code. In fact, I am now seeing the performance benefits of the new frag tree stuff and I am really impressed. Good job! Pete