From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from dell-paw-3.cambridge.redhat.com ([195.224.55.237] helo=passion.cambridge.redhat.com) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 16dSHz-0001d5-00 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2002 08:39:47 +0000 From: David Woodhouse In-Reply-To: <021101c1b9b5$247c0050$f801a8c0@minibm> References: <021101c1b9b5$247c0050$f801a8c0@minibm> <01b401c1b97e$04d09180$f801a8c0@minibm> <00de01c1b8ac$928d8b40$f801a8c0@minibm> <17136.1014059667@redhat.com> <18943.1014154225@redhat.com> To: "Chung Ming" Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: "No Flash Chips Recognized." error. Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 08:51:03 +0000 Message-ID: <11325.1014195063@redhat.com> Sender: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: min@hello.org said: > ahhh!! ok,now I got > mfr = 98, ID = 98. Hmmm. That's odd - getting the same value for the chip ID as for the manufacturer looks suspicious. Precisely what model/size of DiskOnChip is this? -- dwmw2