From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fmr18.intel.com ([134.134.136.17] helo=orsfmr003.jf.intel.com) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1EmS79-000476-8q for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 14 Dec 2005 08:35:56 +0000 From: "zhao, forrest" To: Artem Bityutskiy In-Reply-To: <439FBEDF.7000506@yandex.ru> References: <439C33D2.506@yandex.ru> <1134367675.3152.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> <439D5159.4030704@yandex.ru> <1134455209.7346.12.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20051213114752.GA9165@angel.research.nokia.com> <1134545396.27194.11.camel@localhost.localdomain> <439FBEDF.7000506@yandex.ru> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 16:30:14 +0800 Message-Id: <1134549014.27194.16.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jarkko Lavinen , tglx@linutronix.de, Linux MTD Subject: Re: JFFS2 CVS broken after 2005/11/14 List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , > > > Actually even without that patch JFFS2 doesn't work. I don't know which > regression tests you did, but JFFS2 fails to do simle a thing: > > mount > copy a file > unmount > mount > > and it is reproducable on nandsim. Yes, I reproduced the bug for CVS snapshot after 2005/11/14 on kernel 2.6.12.2. For snapshot before 2005/11/14 on kernel 2.6.12.2, JFFS2 works fine. I just got 2.6.15-rc5 and will do the same test later. Thanks, Forrest