From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from www.osadl.org ([213.239.205.134] helo=mail.tglx.de) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1FsOd1-0003Xb-Dd for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 19:37:42 +0100 Subject: Re: FAT vs jFFS2 for NAND. From: Thomas Gleixner To: Han Chang In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 20:38:52 +0200 Message-Id: <1150742333.29299.43.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: manningc2@actrix.gen.nz, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Reply-To: tglx@linutronix.de List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, 2006-06-19 at 11:31 -0700, Han Chang wrote: > Thanks! The reason for using FAT on the NAND is when the device has the NAND > is connected to a PC via USB, it can appear to be storage device read by the > PC user directly. > > Could you provide more details on how to get this SmartMedia Format driver? Its in the old MTD CVS: cvs -d :ext:anoncvs@cvs.infradead.org:/home/cvs co mtd The driver is in drivers/mtd and probably needs some serious attention. > Anyone know any other source base which I can leverage to do the job? Not that I'm aware of. tglx