From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: Re: FAT vs jFFS2 for NAND. From: David Woodhouse To: Han Chang In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 21:23:46 +0100 Message-Id: <1150748626.2646.7.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, manningc2@actrix.gen.nz, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, 2006-06-19 at 11:31 -0700, Han Chang wrote: > Thanks! The reason for using FAT on the NAND is when the device has the NAND > is connected to a PC via USB, it can appear to be storage device read by the > PC user directly. Can't you use the 'PTP' USB protocol, which is designed for sharing pictures? It can also share an arbitrary file system, I believe. Failing that, SmartMedia makes a certain amount of sense. Use the code from the CVS tree as a basis, or just do it yourself (using the mtd_blkdevs helper stuff which we already use for nftl etc.) -- dwmw2