From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from www.osadl.org ([213.239.205.134] helo=mail.tglx.de) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1FscLx-0001Uc-5W for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 10:16:58 +0100 Subject: Re: [PATCH] AT91RM9200 NAND support From: Thomas Gleixner To: Savin Zlobec In-Reply-To: <4497BAE2.3010602@epico.si> References: <1150786454.15581.289.camel@fuzzie.sanpeople.com> <1150787336.6780.102.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1150787823.15614.297.camel@fuzzie.sanpeople.com> <4497A723.2070006@epico.si> <1150790417.6780.107.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4497BAE2.3010602@epico.si> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 11:18:13 +0200 Message-Id: <1150795093.6780.117.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Reply-To: tglx@linutronix.de List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2006-06-20 at 11:07 +0200, Savin Zlobec wrote: > I've put the kernel with latest mtd on my board and got the following: > > Nand is recognized as 'NAND device: Manufacturer ID: 0x98, Chip ID: 0x75 > (Toshiba NAND 32MiB 3,3V 8-bit)', > should be 'NAND device: Manufacturer ID: 0xec, Chip ID: 0x75 (Samsung > NAND 32MiB 3,3V 8-bit)'. > > No bad blocks are detected at initial nand scan, but when running > flash_eraseall all blocks are found bad. Hmm. The interface has not changed, AFAICT. What version of flash_eraseall are you using and which commandline options ? Can you verify with the latest mtd-utils from http://git.infradead.org/?p=mtd-utils.git;a=summary Thanks, tglx