From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from www.osadl.org ([213.239.205.134] helo=mail.tglx.de) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Fsh8O-0001DX-Df for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 15:23:17 +0100 Subject: Re: [PATCH] AT91RM9200 NAND support From: Thomas Gleixner To: Savin Zlobec In-Reply-To: <44980505.2000003@epico.si> References: <1150786454.15581.289.camel@fuzzie.sanpeople.com> <1150787336.6780.102.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1150787823.15614.297.camel@fuzzie.sanpeople.com> <4497A723.2070006@epico.si> <1150790417.6780.107.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4497BAE2.3010602@epico.si> <1150795093.6780.117.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4497D2CE.7070000@epico.si> <1150801960.6780.132.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4497DF09.70404@epico.si> <1150804501.6780.141.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4497E9D4.9040307@epico.si> <1150807480.6780.157.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4497F1B4.8030702@epico.si> <1150809682.6780.172.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4497FCA4.1060601@epico.si> <1150811833.6780.195.camel@localhost.localdomain> <44980505.2000003@epico.si> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 16:24:37 +0200 Message-Id: <1150813478.6780.207.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Reply-To: tglx@linutronix.de List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2006-06-20 at 16:24 +0200, Savin Zlobec wrote: > >I have no idea why this happens. Never seen that before. > > > > > Indeed it is the STATUS command. If I don't wait after it I can't copy > a single file on the jffs2 partition, inserting a wait there seems to solve > the problem. Well, I really would be interested to find out why this happens. It might hit more users. > The MTD in kernel 2.6.17 doesn't have this wait either, but works for > me... different code paths - different timings ? I'll try to find some time > to check this. I guess its a timing problem, which was hidden by slower code. Can you figure out how long the R/B pin is low in this case ? tglx