From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from www.osadl.org ([213.239.205.134] helo=mail.tglx.de) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Ftpn5-0004cd-8V for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 18:50:02 +0100 Subject: Re: patch with header files not in mtd includes From: Thomas Gleixner To: Ben Dooks In-Reply-To: <20060623172130.GA12107@home.fluff.org> References: <20060623172130.GA12107@home.fluff.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 19:51:34 +0200 Message-Id: <1151085094.25491.282.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Reply-To: tglx@linutronix.de List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, 2006-06-23 at 18:21 +0100, Ben Dooks wrote: > I have udpates for the s3c2410 nand driver which > includes register updates for the header file > include/asm-arm/arch-s3c2410/regs-nand.h. > > Is it ok to send this as one patch, or does it > need the include splitting and sending to rmk? > A seperate split will mean a possible small period > when the driver will not build. the file is nand / mtd related so, there should be no big cry when we commit both into MTD. tglx