From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from www.osadl.org ([213.239.205.134] helo=mail.tglx.de) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1FvUG7-0003M2-Li for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 08:14:48 +0100 Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] drivers/mtd/devices/: remove dead _ecc code From: Thomas Gleixner To: Adrian Bunk In-Reply-To: <20060627131116.GL23314@stusta.de> References: <20060621215840.GP9111@stusta.de> <1150928664.25491.34.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20060627131116.GL23314@stusta.de> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 09:16:25 +0200 Message-Id: <1151478985.25491.489.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, dwmw2@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Reply-To: tglx@linutronix.de List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 15:11 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > nand_ecc isn't dead code. > > But if I do understand correctly, you have pending patches to let the > code your patch made dead code and my patch would have removed be used > again? Ooops, sorry for shooting too fast. You're right I rendered that stuff dead unintentionally. But removing is not an option. I fix it proper Thanks tglx