From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Cc: juha.yrjola@solidboot.com, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jlavi@iki.fi
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] make drivers/mtd/cmdlinepart.c:mtdpart_setup() static
Date: Sun, 09 Jul 2006 10:12:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1152436332.25567.12.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060629173206.GF19712@stusta.de>
On Thu, 2006-06-29 at 19:32 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 02:49:00PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 00:02 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > This patch makes the needlessly global mtdpart_setup() static.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
> > >
> > > --- linux-2.6.17-mm2-full/drivers/mtd/cmdlinepart.c.old 2006-06-26 23:18:39.000000000 +0200
> > > +++ linux-2.6.17-mm2-full/drivers/mtd/cmdlinepart.c 2006-06-26 23:18:51.000000000 +0200
> > > @@ -346,7 +346,7 @@
> > > *
> > > * This function needs to be visible for bootloaders.
> > > */
> > > -int mtdpart_setup(char *s)
> > > +static int mtdpart_setup(char *s)
> >
> > Patch lacks sufficient explanation. Explain the relevance of the comment
> > immediately above the function declaration, in the context of your
> > patch. Explain your decision to change the behaviour, but not change the
> > comment itself.
>
> My explanation regarding the relevance of the comment is that it seems
> to be nonsense.
>
> Do I miss something, or why and how should a bootloader access
> in-kernel functions?
I'm not entirely sure, but allegedly it does -- Juha, can you elaborate?
--
dwmw2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-09 9:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-26 22:02 [2.6 patch] make drivers/mtd/cmdlinepart.c:mtdpart_setup() static Adrian Bunk
2006-06-27 13:49 ` David Woodhouse
2006-06-29 17:32 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-07-09 9:12 ` David Woodhouse [this message]
2006-07-09 16:12 ` Juha Yrjölä
2006-07-10 10:56 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2006-07-10 11:37 ` David Woodhouse
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-11-25 19:15 Adrian Bunk
2006-11-28 22:19 ` David Woodhouse
2006-11-30 18:45 ` Andy Isaacson
2006-12-01 13:41 ` Jarkko Lavinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1152436332.25567.12.camel@shinybook.infradead.org \
--to=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=jlavi@iki.fi \
--cc=juha.yrjola@solidboot.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox