Re: [PATCH] PNX8550 NAND flash driver

[Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>]

On Tue, 2006-02-14 at 15:59 +0300, Vladimir A. Barinov wrote:
> >> +    }
> >> +
> >> +    if (((bytes & 3) || (bytes < 16)) || ((u32) to & 3) || ((u32) 
> >> from & 3)) {
> >> +        if (((bytes & 1) == 0) &&
> >> +            (((u32) to & 1) == 0) && (((u32) from & 1) == 0)) {
> >> +            int words = bytes / 2;
> >> +
> >> +            local_irq_disable();
> >> +            for (i = 0; i < words; i++) {
> >> +                to16[i] = from16[i];
> >> +            }
> >> +            local_irq_enable();
> >
> >
> > Really necessary to disable all irqs around this transfer?  How long 
> > can interrupts be off during that time?
> 
> That is needed since the NAND device is binded to the external XIO bus 
> that could be used by another devices.

Err, you have to protect the whole access sequence then. What protects
the chip against access between the command write and data read ?

If this really is a bus conflict problem, then you need some more
protection than this.

Can you please describe in detail why you think this is necessary. 

	tglx