From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Jurgen <jurgen.parmentier@telenet.be>
Cc: Todd Poynor <tpoynor@mvista.com>,
"Vladimir A. Barinov" <vbarinov@ru.mvista.com>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PNX8550 NAND flash driver
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 09:02:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1153897373.26845.77.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44C66437.9030402@telenet.be>
On Tue, 2006-07-25 at 20:34 +0200, Jurgen wrote:
> Root cause of the problem lies within the early implementation of the
> low-level NAND commands. There was a severe risk that the PCI accesses
> were stalled because of a Read Status command for the NAND Flash. This
> Read Status was launched immediately after program/erase command. The
> hardware itself will wait for the Ready/Busy to be high and only then
> launch the Read Status command. This behavior caused timeout on the
> internal bus because PCI was unable to use the pins during this wait.
The hardware design is broken. Status Read can be requested while R/B is
low. See NAND datasheets.
> If this problem was coinciding with an ISR that tried to perform a PCI
> status register, then this PCI access could possibly timeout (because
> the PCI pins were already claimed for the XIO access that is depending
> on the RBY signal).
>
> Since the problem only showed during the PCI device ISR, the
> quick'n'dirty hack was to disable interrupts during XIO accesses.
>
> A better fix that should be available somewhere, is to improve the
> low-level NAND driver that will first check the status of the Ready/Busy
> line and only THEN launch the Read NAND Status command...
Thats not an improvement. Thats a hack for your broken hardware. You'd
burden the R/B check on every sane hardware out there.
You can add the R/B check to the chip->cmd_ctrl() function of your board
driver.
tglx
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-26 6:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-16 17:23 [PATCH] PNX8550 NAND flash driver Vladimir A. Barinov
2005-12-20 14:28 ` Vladimir A. Barinov
2006-01-12 18:24 ` Todd Poynor
2006-02-14 13:00 ` Vladimir A. Barinov
2006-02-22 0:57 ` Todd Poynor
2006-07-10 9:53 ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-07-25 18:34 ` Jurgen
2006-07-26 7:02 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1153897373.26845.77.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=jurgen.parmentier@telenet.be \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=tpoynor@mvista.com \
--cc=vbarinov@ru.mvista.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox