From: "ahgu" <ahgu@ahgu.homeunix.com>
To: <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: simulate a bad NAND block cause kernel hang
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 11:41:59 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <115601c5a98b$8b856290$1f1a12ac@atitech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1124977495.20120.111.camel@tglx.tec.linutronix.de
I am using 2.4.18 kernel.
jffs2_erase_failed(c, jeb);is the last function before the fault condition
get triggered.
Where can I find the diff between 2.4.18 and 2.4.20?
void jffs2_erase_block(struct jffs2_sb_info *c, struct jffs2_eraseblock
*jeb)
{
int ret;
#ifdef __ECOS
ret = jffs2_flash_erase(c, jeb);
if (!ret) {
jffs2_erase_succeeded(c, jeb);
return;
}
#else /* Linux */
struct erase_info *instr;
instr = kmalloc(sizeof(struct erase_info) + sizeof(struct
erase_priv_struct), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!instr) {
printk(KERN_WARNING "kmalloc for struct erase_info in jffs2_erase_block
failed. Refiling block for later\n");
spin_lock(&c->erase_completion_lock);
list_del(&jeb->list);
list_add(&jeb->list, &c->erase_pending_list);
c->erasing_size -= c->sector_size;
c->dirty_size += c->sector_size;
jeb->dirty_size = c->sector_size;
spin_unlock(&c->erase_completion_lock);
return;
}
memset(instr, 0, sizeof(*instr));
instr->mtd = c->mtd;
instr->addr = jeb->offset;
instr->len = c->sector_size;
instr->callback = jffs2_erase_callback;
instr->priv = (unsigned long)(&instr[1]);
((struct erase_priv_struct *)instr->priv)->jeb = jeb;
((struct erase_priv_struct *)instr->priv)->c = c;
/* NAND , read out the fail counter, if possible */
if (!jffs2_can_mark_obsolete(c))
jffs2_nand_read_failcnt(c,jeb);
ret = c->mtd->erase(c->mtd, instr);
if (!ret)
return;
kfree(instr);
#endif /* __ECOS */
if (ret == -ENOMEM || ret == -EAGAIN) {
/* Erase failed immediately. Refile it on the list */
D1(printk(KERN_DEBUG "Erase at 0x%08x failed: %d. Refiling on
erase_pending_list\n", jeb->offset, ret));
spin_lock(&c->erase_completion_lock);
list_del(&jeb->list);
list_add(&jeb->list, &c->erase_pending_list);
c->erasing_size -= c->sector_size;
c->dirty_size += c->sector_size;
jeb->dirty_size = c->sector_size;
spin_unlock(&c->erase_completion_lock);
return;
}
if (ret == -EROFS)
printk(KERN_WARNING "Erase at 0x%08x failed immediately: -EROFS. Is the
sector locked?\n", jeb->offset);
else
printk(KERN_WARNING "Erase at 0x%08x failed immediately: errno %d\n",
jeb->offset, ret);
jffs2_erase_failed(c, jeb);
}
----- Original Message -----
From: "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: "ahgu" <ahgu@ahgu.homeunix.com>
Cc: <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 9:44 AM
Subject: Re: simulate a bad NAND block cause kernel hang
> On Thu, 2005-08-25 at 09:27 -0400, ahgu wrote:
>> I forced the flash_erase function to fail. I expect the jffs2 will pick
>> up
>> the return error and mark the block bad and put the bad block in a
>> bad_block
>> list. But what I get is kernel failure:
>> I get similar error when I simulate a write error.
>> Am I doing the bad block simulation correctly? Is this a correct
>> response?
>> What is supposed to happen when the NAND flash grow a bad block?
>
> JFFS2 should handle this.
>
> The oops trace is worthless, as it does not show the stack trace in
> human readable form (function names decoded)
>
> Make sure that CONFIG_KALLSYMS is set in your kernel .config file.
>
> Also information about kernel version and possibly applied MTD/JFFS2
> patches is missing.
>
>
> tglx
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-25 15:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-25 13:27 simulate a bad NAND block cause kernel hang ahgu
2005-08-25 13:44 ` Thomas Gleixner
2005-08-25 15:41 ` ahgu [this message]
2005-08-25 15:47 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='115601c5a98b$8b856290$1f1a12ac@atitech.com' \
--to=ahgu@ahgu.homeunix.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox