From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgw-ext13.nokia.com ([131.228.20.172]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.62 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1GZp7V-0006mc-Mi for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 17 Oct 2006 09:36:44 -0400 Subject: Re: JFFS2 on Lite5200 From: Artem Bityutskiy To: Andrey Volkov In-Reply-To: <4534D8A5.7060206@varma-el.com> References: <1161081183.22948.58.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4534D8A5.7060206@varma-el.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 16:36:33 +0300 Message-Id: <1161092193.3260.61.camel@sauron> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Andrea Galbusera , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org Reply-To: dedekind@infradead.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2006-10-17 at 17:20 +0400, Andrey Volkov wrote: > P.S. Artem, I repeat, I sent this patch _HALF_YEAR_AGO_ > how about to fix scan.c? Andrey, I am not JFFS2 maintainer, David Woodhouse is. Just looked into your patch. I agree that it may make sense to teach JFFS2 to use only aligned addresses, but your patch changes include/asm-ppc/io.h which is probably not MTD's business. It probably makes sense to submit these changes to a PPC maintainer separately. A question - does this mean that one can write only 4-byte chunks to this NOR (?) flash? --=20 Best regards, Artem Bityutskiy (=D0=91=D0=B8=D1=82=D1=8E=D1=86=D0=BA=D0=B8=D0=B9 =D0=90= =D1=80=D1=82=D1=91=D0=BC)