From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgw-ext11.nokia.com ([131.228.20.170]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.62 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1GdSG3-00035N-Rj for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 27 Oct 2006 10:00:33 -0400 Subject: Re: mtd-utils/flash_erase modifications From: Artem Bityutskiy To: Ricard Wanderlof In-Reply-To: References: <1161952796.3080.8.camel@sauron> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 16:59:44 +0300 Message-Id: <1161957584.3080.19.camel@sauron> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Linux mtd Reply-To: dedekind@infradead.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, 2006-10-27 at 14:56 +0200, Ricard Wanderlof wrote: > > Err, are you talking about flash_erase? >=20 > Yes ... ? I just thought that it works only with one eraseblock. > I think it would be nice to have all the functionality in the same=20 > utility. After all, the functionality is really the same. I personally fully agree with you oat this point. Would be nice to have Josh's comment as he mostly cares about the user-space utilities. > 2. modify flash_eraseall to handle partial erases, change name to > flash_erase (and throw out the old flash_erase). I would be happier with this. --=20 Best regards, Artem Bityutskiy (=D0=91=D0=B8=D1=82=D1=8E=D1=86=D0=BA=D0=B8=D0=B9 =D0=90= =D1=80=D1=82=D1=91=D0=BC)