From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgw-ext12.nokia.com ([131.228.20.171]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.62 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1GfGd0-0007MR-Lu for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 01 Nov 2006 08:59:45 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] remove len/ooblen confusion in MTD/NAND code From: Artem Bityutskiy To: Ricard Wanderlof In-Reply-To: References: <20061030145105.84f953e7.vwool@ru.mvista.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2006 15:59:27 +0200 Message-Id: <1162389567.7527.6.camel@sauron> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Linux mtd , Vitaly Wool Reply-To: dedekind@infradead.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 12:58 +0100, Ricard Wanderlof wrote: > My only comment at this stage is a trivial one: many of the debug texts d= o=20 > not match the function they are placed in. Doesn't really have anything t= o=20 > do with the reason for the patch though, but makes for confusing debug=20 > output. True. Feel free to send a patch :-) --=20 Best regards, Artem Bityutskiy (=D0=91=D0=B8=D1=82=D1=8E=D1=86=D0=BA=D0=B8=D0=B9 =D0=90= =D1=80=D1=82=D1=91=D0=BC)