From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgw-ext13.nokia.com ([131.228.20.172]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.62 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1GhRfH-00077C-B1 for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 07 Nov 2006 09:11:10 -0500 Subject: Re: UBI and OneNAND From: Artem Bityutskiy To: Josh Boyer In-Reply-To: <1162900051.19697.16.camel@crusty.rchland.ibm.com> References: <32544906.187201162866905328.JavaMail.weblogic@ep_ml06> <1162889433.5606.15.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1162899578.31636.19.camel@sauron> <1162900051.19697.16.camel@crusty.rchland.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2006 16:10:37 +0200 Message-Id: <1162908637.31636.23.camel@sauron> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: John Smith , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Reply-To: dedekind@infradead.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 2006-11-07 at 05:47 -0600, Josh Boyer wrote: > It's the default. I think it's too low of a default. Others disagreed > with me. >=20 > Telling every new UBI user "may be it makes sense to reserve more" will > get old quick. Perhaps the default should be bumped to 5 or so? Actually with 128MiB flash the default ends up with something like 32EBs, which looks even too large, so I do not know... --=20 Best regards, Artem Bityutskiy (=D0=91=D0=B8=D1=82=D1=8E=D1=86=D0=BA=D0=B8=D0=B9 =D0=90= =D1=80=D1=82=D1=91=D0=BC)