From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgw-ext14.nokia.com ([131.228.20.173]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.62 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1GiYwU-0007CQ-Qg for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 11:09:30 -0500 Subject: Re: mount costs too long From: Artem Bityutskiy To: Aubrey In-Reply-To: <6d6a94c50611100648g87770a0qb723fad11fa65cd8@mail.gmail.com> References: <6d6a94c50611092305v6f52b9b0hfd254e10a2992d44@mail.gmail.com> <1163159781.19697.24.camel@crusty.rchland.ibm.com> <6d6a94c50611100648g87770a0qb723fad11fa65cd8@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 18:08:18 +0200 Message-Id: <1163174898.3925.13.camel@sauron> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Reply-To: dedekind@infradead.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, 2006-11-10 at 22:48 +0800, Aubrey wrote: > I got a clue from YAFFS mailing list, this is a known issue on 2.6.18 ker= nels. > It is caused by the MTD layer rework and corresponding yaffs-mtd layer > modifications. Namely, an additional translation had to be implemented > for OOB area for 512b page chips. Is it possible to describe this in more details? And why YAFFS people do not fix this? --=20 Best regards, Artem Bityutskiy (=D0=91=D0=B8=D1=82=D1=8E=D1=86=D0=BA=D0=B8=D0=B9 =D0=90= =D1=80=D1=82=D1=91=D0=BC)