From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from dell-paw-3.cambridge.redhat.com ([195.224.55.237] helo=passion.cambridge.redhat.com) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 16MXRX-0003fL-00 for ; Fri, 04 Jan 2002 16:43:43 +0000 From: David Woodhouse In-Reply-To: <9A1957CB9FC45A4FA6F35961093ABB8406456E99@srvmail-mtl.montreal.ubisoft.org> References: <9A1957CB9FC45A4FA6F35961093ABB8406456E99@srvmail-mtl.montreal.ubisoft.org> To: Patrick Allaire Cc: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_Eriksson?= , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: From 2.4.9 to CVS ??? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2002 16:54:27 +0000 Message-ID: <11638.1010163267@redhat.com> Sender: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: pallaire@gameloft.com said: > No I dont have 'bad cramfs magic' !!! I tought it could be the case > ... but I looked at the mkcramfs.c from the 2.4.9 and 2.4.17 version > and there is no difference So the generated code should be the same. P'raps we started paying attention to execute bits on libraries between 2.4.9 and 2.4.17? I thought we did that a long time ago though. Put a statically linked shell in the cramfs and boot with that as init. Then try running /sbin/init and see what errors you get. -- dwmw2