From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgw-ext12.nokia.com ([131.228.20.171]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.62 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Gm4HG-0000O1-O8 for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 03:13:47 -0500 Subject: Re: starter! From: Artem Bityutskiy To: Darshak In-Reply-To: <005801c70c5d$df382900$3d0fa8c0@elitecore1561> References: <2785.192.168.15.61.1163841555.squirrel@newwebmail.elitecore.com> <1163854310.5597.62.camel@sauron> <005801c70c5d$df382900$3d0fa8c0@elitecore1561> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 09:34:39 +0200 Message-Id: <1164008079.5597.80.camel@sauron> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Reply-To: dedekind@infradead.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, 2006-11-20 at 10:09 +0530, Darshak wrote: > is JFFS2 is worth using for NAND flash ? > or it supports only NOR? >=20 > I come to know that JFFS2 has some problems at mounting [ takes longer=20 > time ] and occupies more RAM? > How much time does it take to mount 512 and 1 GB flash? How much RAM does= it=20 > require? Just try it. I know people using it with 512 MiB NANDs and are quite happy. --=20 Best regards, Artem Bityutskiy (=D0=91=D0=B8=D1=82=D1=8E=D1=86=D0=BA=D0=B8=D0=B9 =D0=90= =D1=80=D1=82=D1=91=D0=BC)